In congressional testimony on Thursday, September 15, U.S. Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC) Chairman Rostin Behnam urged U.S. Senators to go a invoice that may explicitly grant the CFTC broad regulatory oversight over the cryptocurrency market. His remarks are the newest in a sequence from regulators who’ve struggled with questions over whether or not they have jurisdiction over the rising, and quickly rising, cryptocurrency market.
Whereas he famous that the laws was not excellent – saying that it was a “step in the correct course” – Chairman Behnam’s feedback point out that regulatory companies would strongly favor that their jurisdiction on this matter be made express through direct congressional motion. Such an angle is just not a shock, on condition that proposed rulemaking on crypto has resulted in vital backlash from the trade, with guarantees to tie up proposed regulations in administrative lawsuits if they’re adopted and as an alternative advocating for a new regulatory regime tailored to crypto. If Congress had been to enact a statute granting the CFTC or the SEC authority to control the cryptocurrency market, nevertheless, regulators could be on much more strong floor.
Chairman Behnam’s remarks largely echo the angle of SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Although he has made some comments indicating he desires the SEC to interact in rulemaking to control crypto, up to now, the SEC’s jurisdiction has been slowly constructed via one-off enforcement actions. Gensler has consistently advocated, nevertheless, for brand new statutes to grant the SEC jurisdiction on this space. On Thursday, Chairman Gensler reiterated his place, highlighting his concern that many frequent crypto belongings (equivalent to stablecoins) and cryptocurrency transactions (together with ICOs), in addition to many points of the cryptocurrency market infrastructure (together with buying and selling, lending and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms), all implicate Federal securities legal guidelines and SEC laws, along with individually implicating Federal commodities legal guidelines; he additionally famous, nevertheless, that any future crypto rulemaking could possibly be years away. Within the interim, even when the Invoice is handed as drafted, the shortage of SEC rulemaking that addresses the “securities” points of crypto belongings, transactions and market infrastructure would imply the complete extent of the SEC’s jurisdiction would proceed to be constructed by iterative enforcement actions which are slowly constructing a physique of precedent to information each the regulators and cryptocurrency market actors.
The unsure regulatory and statutory outlook current each issues and alternatives for the cryptocurrency market. On the one hand, the shortage of rulemaking or congressional motion signifies that the decentralized finance, or DeFi, market might proceed to interact with and develop their merchandise, a minimum of in the interim, inside a extra lax regulatory image than that of their centralized finance counterparts. However, with out clear regulation on this challenge, gamers within the cryptocurrency house might face main complications, as they’ve far much less authorized steering than these dealing in conventional securities. These circumstances underscore the very important function that exterior counsel can play in serving to corporations and people proceed to innovate and succeed within the cryptocurrency market whereas making an attempt to reduce litigation and regulatory threat.
© 2022 Proskauer Rose LLP. Nationwide Legislation Evaluate, Quantity XII, Quantity 263